Government of Gujarat vs Ajaybhai Ramsingbhai Tadvi Advocate - A A DAYMA — 366/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,3,181,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR060003932026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
366/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
366/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARUDESHWAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
27th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823027250114
Police Station
KEVADIA TRAFFIC POLICE STATION - NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Ajaybhai Ramsingbhai Tadvi Advocate - A A DAYMA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-04-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 24-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 10-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 366/2026, Judicial Magistrate First Class Court, Garudeshwar, Narmada District Decision: The court acquitted the accused (Ajaybhai Ramsinghbhai Tadvi) of charges under Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) and IPC Sections 185, 3, 181, finding insufficient evidence of drunk driving. The prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, as independent witness testimony did not corroborate key allegations, and required medical/forensic reports were not properly submitted. The accused is granted bail of Rs. 15,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 366/2026, Judicial Magistrate First Class Court, Garudeshwar, Narmada District Decision: The court acquitted the accused (Ajaybhai Ramsinghbhai Tadvi) of charges under Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) and IPC Sections 185, 3, 181, finding insufficient evidence of drunk driving. The prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, as independent witness testimony did not corroborate key allegations, and required medical/forensic reports were not properly submitted. The accused is granted bail of Rs. 15,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts