Government of Gujarat vs Rohitkumar Dilipbhai Ghare Advocate - A A DAYMA — 365/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,3,181. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR060003922026

Filing Number

365/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

365/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GARUDESHWAR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823028250176

Police Station

SOU SALAMATI POLICE STATION - NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,3,181
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rohitkumar Dilipbhai Ghare Advocate - A A DAYMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted the accused (Rohit Kumar Dilip Bhai Dhare) of charges under Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(B) and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 185, 3, 181. The judgment found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving under the influence of alcohol, as independent witness evidence did not corroborate the blood sample analysis and mandatory procedural requirements were not followed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 365/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused (Rohit Kumar Dilip Bhai Dhare) of charges under Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(B) and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 185, 3, 181. The judgment found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving under the influence of alcohol, as independent witness evidence did not corroborate the blood sample analysis and mandatory procedural requirements were not followed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case