Government of Gujarat vs Kaushikbhai Vikrambhai Tadvi Advocate - S A THAKOR — 364/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR060003912026
Filing Number
364/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
364/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARUDESHWAR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
27-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823014250375
Police Station
KEVADIYA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kaushikbhai Vikrambhai Tadvi Advocate - S A THAKOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court acquitted the defendant of charges under BNS Section 281 (rash/negligent driving) and MV Act Sections 181, 177(3), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the vehicle was driven recklessly or negligently on a public road. The court noted insufficient corroborating evidence from witnesses and determined the defendant was entitled to the benefit of doubt, thereby ordering the defendant's acquittal and release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Apr-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 364/2026
The court acquitted the defendant of charges under BNS Section 281 (rash/negligent driving) and MV Act Sections 181, 177(3), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the vehicle was driven recklessly or negligently on a public road. The court noted insufficient corroborating evidence from witnesses and determined the defendant was entitled to the benefit of doubt, thereby ordering the defendant's acquittal and release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts