Government of Gujarat vs Kaushikbhai Vikrambhai Tadvi Advocate - S A THAKOR — 364/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR060003912026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

364/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

364/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GARUDESHWAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

27th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823014250375

Police Station

KEVADIYA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 281,
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 3,181,177,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Kaushikbhai Vikrambhai Tadvi Advocate - S A THAKOR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

27-04-2026

Disposed

09-04-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

24-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

10-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

27-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court acquitted the defendant of charges under BNS Section 281 (rash/negligent driving) and MV Act Sections 181, 177(3), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the vehicle was driven recklessly or negligently on a public road. The court noted insufficient corroborating evidence from witnesses and determined the defendant was entitled to the benefit of doubt, thereby ordering the defendant's acquittal and release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the defendant of charges under BNS Section 281 (rash/negligent driving) and MV Act Sections 181, 177(3), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the vehicle was driven recklessly or negligently on a public road. The court noted insufficient corroborating evidence from witnesses and determined the defendant was entitled to the benefit of doubt, thereby ordering the defendant's acquittal and release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, GARUDESHWAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case