Government of Gujarat vs Hareshbhai Dineshbhai Tadvi Advocate - S A THAKOR — 362/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,3,181. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 28th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR060003892026

Filing Number

362/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

362/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GARUDESHWAR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

28-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823014250377

Police Station

KEVADIYA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,3,181
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Hareshbhai Dineshbhai Tadvi Advocate - S A THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Garudeshwar (Narmada) acquitted the accused Hareshbhai Dineshbhai Tadvi of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 185, 3, 181. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the accused was driving while intoxicated, as the independent witnesses (panchas) did not corroborate the police narrative, blood samples were not properly submitted to the forensic lab as required by the 1959 Medical Examination Rules, and critical procedural safeguards under the Motor Vehicles Act Section 209 were not followed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 362/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Garudeshwar (Narmada) acquitted the accused Hareshbhai Dineshbhai Tadvi of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 185, 3, 181. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the accused was driving while intoxicated, as the independent witnesses (panchas) did not corroborate the police narrative, blood samples were not properly submitted to the forensic lab as required by the 1959 Medical Examination Rules, and critical procedural safeguards under the Motor Vehicles Act Section 209 were not followed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case