Government of Gujarat vs Priteshbhai Ravindrabhai Tadvi Advocate - U R TADVI — 360/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 28th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR060003872026
Filing Number
360/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
360/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARUDESHWAR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
28-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823014250379
Police Station
KEVADIYA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Priteshbhai Ravindrabhai Tadvi Advocate - U R TADVI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
Judegement
Summary The court acquitted the accused Priteshbhai Ravindrabhai Tadvi of charges under BNS Section 281 and MV Act Sections 3, 181, 177. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly or negligently operated a vehicle without a valid license on a public road. The court found that key prosecution witnesses (the panchas) did not substantiate the allegations in their testimony, and the prosecution could not establish the requisite elements of the offense, warranting the accused's acquittal with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Apr-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 360/2026
Summary The court acquitted the accused Priteshbhai Ravindrabhai Tadvi of charges under BNS Section 281 and MV Act Sections 3, 181, 177. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly or negligently operated a vehicle without a valid license on a public road. The court found that key prosecution witnesses (the panchas) did not substantiate the allegations in their testimony, and the prosecution could not establish the requisite elements of the offense, warranting the accused's acquittal with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts