Government of Gujarat vs Priteshbhai Ravindrabhai Tadvi Advocate - U R TADVI — 360/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 28th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR060003872026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
360/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
360/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARUDESHWAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823014250379
Police Station
KEVADIYA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Priteshbhai Ravindrabhai Tadvi Advocate - U R TADVI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
WARRANT OF ARREST
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-04-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 02-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 24-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST | |
| 10-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused Priteshbhai Ravindrabhai Tadvi of charges under BNS Section 281 and MV Act Sections 3, 181, 177. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly or negligently operated a vehicle without a valid license on a public road. The court found that key prosecution witnesses (the panchas) did not substantiate the allegations in their testimony, and the prosecution could not establish the requisite elements of the offense, warranting the accused's acquittal with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused Priteshbhai Ravindrabhai Tadvi of charges under BNS Section 281 and MV Act Sections 3, 181, 177. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly or negligently operated a vehicle without a valid license on a public road. The court found that key prosecution witnesses (the panchas) did not substantiate the allegations in their testimony, and the prosecution could not establish the requisite elements of the offense, warranting the accused's acquittal with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts