Government of Gujarat vs Vishalbhai Hasamukhbhai Solanki Advocate - A A DAYMA — 359/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 28th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR060003862026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

359/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

359/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GARUDESHWAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

28th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823014250387

Police Station

KEVADIYA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 281,
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 3,181,177,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Vishalbhai Hasamukhbhai Solanki Advocate - A A DAYMA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

28-04-2026

Disposed

10-04-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

01-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

24-03-2026

WARRANT OF ARREST

10-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

28-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Garudeshwar acquitted the accused Shalbhai Hasmukbhai Solanki of charges under BNS Section 281 (rash or negligent driving) and MV Act Sections 181, 177(3). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove recklessly or negligently, as the panch witnesses contradicted the complainant's claims during examination. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution's case lacked conclusive evidence—the panchnama details were unsupported by witness testimony, the exact vehicle speed was not documented, and no accident or injury resulted from the alleged driving. The burden of proof remained on the prosecution, and given the evidentiary gaps and unexplained circumstances, the accused benefited from reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Garudeshwar acquitted the accused Shalbhai Hasmukbhai Solanki of charges under BNS Section 281 (rash or negligent driving) and MV Act Sections 181, 177(3). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove recklessly or negligently, as the panch witnesses contradicted the complainant's claims during examination. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution's case lacked conclusive evidence—the panchnama details were unsupported by witness testimony, the exact vehicle speed was not documented, and no accident or injury resulted from the alleged driving. The burden of proof remained on the prosecution, and given the evidentiary gaps and unexplained circumstances, the accused benefited from reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, GARUDESHWAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case