Government of Gujarat vs Vishalbhai Hasamukhbhai Solanki Advocate - A A DAYMA — 359/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 28th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR060003862026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
359/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
359/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARUDESHWAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823014250387
Police Station
KEVADIYA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Vishalbhai Hasamukhbhai Solanki Advocate - A A DAYMA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
WARRANT OF ARREST
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-04-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 01-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 24-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST | |
| 10-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Garudeshwar acquitted the accused Shalbhai Hasmukbhai Solanki of charges under BNS Section 281 (rash or negligent driving) and MV Act Sections 181, 177(3). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove recklessly or negligently, as the panch witnesses contradicted the complainant's claims during examination. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution's case lacked conclusive evidence—the panchnama details were unsupported by witness testimony, the exact vehicle speed was not documented, and no accident or injury resulted from the alleged driving. The burden of proof remained on the prosecution, and given the evidentiary gaps and unexplained circumstances, the accused benefited from reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Garudeshwar acquitted the accused Shalbhai Hasmukbhai Solanki of charges under BNS Section 281 (rash or negligent driving) and MV Act Sections 181, 177(3). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove recklessly or negligently, as the panch witnesses contradicted the complainant's claims during examination. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution's case lacked conclusive evidence—the panchnama details were unsupported by witness testimony, the exact vehicle speed was not documented, and no accident or injury resulted from the alleged driving. The burden of proof remained on the prosecution, and given the evidentiary gaps and unexplained circumstances, the accused benefited from reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts