Government of Gujarat vs Shantilalbhai Ramanbhai Tadvi Advocate - A A DAYMA — 355/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 28th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR060003822026
Filing Number
355/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
355/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARUDESHWAR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
28-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823014250416
Police Station
KEVADIYA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shantilalbhai Ramanbhai Tadvi Advocate - A A DAYMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class Court in Garudeshwar acquitted the accused Shantilal Bhai Raman Bhai Tadvi under the Prohibition Act Section 85(1), giving him the benefit of doubt due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was found in an intoxicated state with illicit liquor, as independent witnesses (panchas) did not corroborate the prosecution's case and the blood sample report from the FSL was not produced in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Apr-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 355/2026
Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class Court in Garudeshwar acquitted the accused Shantilal Bhai Raman Bhai Tadvi under the Prohibition Act Section 85(1), giving him the benefit of doubt due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was found in an intoxicated state with illicit liquor, as independent witnesses (panchas) did not corroborate the prosecution's case and the blood sample report from the FSL was not produced in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts