Government of Gujarat vs Sanjaybhai Naranbhai Tadvi Advocate - S A THAKOR — 217/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,3,181,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR060002322026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
217/2026
Filing Date
19-02-2026
Registration No
217/2026
Registration Date
19-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARUDESHWAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823014250282
Police Station
KEVADIYA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sanjaybhai Naranbhai Tadvi Advocate - S A THAKOR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 21-04-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 03-04-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 03-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC NO-217/2026 The court acquitted the accused Sanjaybhai Naranbhai Tadvi of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(B) and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 185, 3, and 181, giving him the benefit of doubt. The prosecution failed to provide sufficient independent corroborating evidence—specifically, the blood sample examination report from the forensic laboratory and proper documentation under the 1959 Medical Examination Rules—to conclusively prove the accused was driving under the influence of alcohol. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC NO-217/2026 The court acquitted the accused Sanjaybhai Naranbhai Tadvi of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(B) and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 185, 3, and 181, giving him the benefit of doubt. The prosecution failed to provide sufficient independent corroborating evidence—specifically, the blood sample examination report from the forensic laboratory and proper documentation under the 1959 Medical Examination Rules—to conclusively prove the accused was driving under the influence of alcohol. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts