Government Of Gujarat vs Gautambhai Jayantibhai Dhobi Advocate - S S DIWAN — 1151/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 02nd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR050012852025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1151/2025
Filing Date
19-11-2025
Registration No
1151/2025
Registration Date
19-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, TILAKWADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823025250870
Police Station
TILAKWADA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government Of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Gautambhai Jayantibhai Dhobi Advocate - S S DIWAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 25-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 16-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class Court, Tilakvada (Narmada district) acquitted the accused Gautamabhai Jayantibhai Dhobi of charges under BNS Section 281 and MV Act Sections 177, 184. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove his vehicle recklessly or negligently on July 30, 2025. The evidence presented by witnesses (panchas and officials) was contradictory and uncorroborated regarding the manner of driving, and no accident or injury was proven to have occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class Court, Tilakvada (Narmada district) acquitted the accused Gautamabhai Jayantibhai Dhobi of charges under BNS Section 281 and MV Act Sections 177, 184. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove his vehicle recklessly or negligently on July 30, 2025. The evidence presented by witnesses (panchas and officials) was contradictory and uncorroborated regarding the manner of driving, and no accident or injury was proven to have occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts