Government of Gujarat vs Vasantbhai Mangabhai Vasava — 448/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR040004702026

Filing Number

448/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

448/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEDIAPADA

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823004250674

Police Station

DEDIAPADA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-b

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vasantbhai Mangabhai Vasava

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 185 and Probation of Offenders Act Section 12(1) for a traffic-related offense (vehicle without proper documentation). Considering the accused's poverty, first-time offense, remorse, family dependence, and lack of coercion in confession, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine (or 5 days imprisonment in default) instead of the maximum penalty, while also ordering confiscation of the vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 448/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 185 and Probation of Offenders Act Section 12(1) for a traffic-related offense (vehicle without proper documentation). Considering the accused's poverty, first-time offense, remorse, family dependence, and lack of coercion in confession, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine (or 5 days imprisonment in default) instead of the maximum penalty, while also ordering confiscation of the vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case