Government of Gujarat vs VINODBHAI SOMABHAI BARIYA — 109/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,3,181. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 15th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR040001272026
e-Filing Number
02-09-2025
Filing Number
109/2026
Filing Date
23-Jan-2026
Registration No
109/2026
Registration Date
23-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEDIAPADA
Judge
2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823004251009
Police Station
DEDIAPADA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.VINODBHAI SOMABHAI BARIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 279 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1) for rash and negligent driving while under the influence of alcohol, sentencing him to six months imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 600, with an additional five days simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. The court considered the accused's poverty, first-time offense, remorse, and promise of future good conduct while imposing a lenient sentence rather than the maximum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 109/2026
The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 279 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1) for rash and negligent driving while under the influence of alcohol, sentencing him to six months imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 600, with an additional five days simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. The court considered the accused's poverty, first-time offense, remorse, and promise of future good conduct while imposing a lenient sentence rather than the maximum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts