Government of Gujarat vs KARANBHAI KANTIBHAI RATHOD — 107/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,3,181. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR040001232026

e-Filing Number

03-03-2025

Filing Number

107/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

107/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEDIAPADA

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823004241938

Police Station

DEDIAPADA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,3,181
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KARANBHAI KANTIBHAI RATHOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 279/427 and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Sections 185/3 and 66(1), imposing a fine of ₹600 with imprisonment of 5 additional days if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered the accused's first-time offender status, poverty, remorse, and undertaking to prevent future offenses, resulting in a lenient sentence rather than maximum punishment as per established judicial principles for traffic and property damage cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 107/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 279/427 and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Sections 185/3 and 66(1), imposing a fine of ₹600 with imprisonment of 5 additional days if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered the accused's first-time offender status, poverty, remorse, and undertaking to prevent future offenses, resulting in a lenient sentence rather than maximum punishment as per established judicial principles for traffic and property damage cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case