Government of Gujarat vs KIRANBHAI MOTIRAMBHAI VASAVA — 103/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR040001192026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

19-09-2025

Filing Number

103/2026

Filing Date

22-01-2026

Registration No

103/2026

Registration Date

22-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEDIAPADA

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823004251108

Police Station

DEDIAPADA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

KIRANBHAI MOTIRAMBHAI VASAVA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

PLEA

03-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The Dediyapada court sentenced the accused to imprisonment of Rs. 200 (or 5 days simple imprisonment in default) under IPC Section 294(1) for using obscene language in public, considering it was the accused's first offense, his poor economic background, and his express remorse and promise not to repeat such conduct. The court applied lenient sentencing principles by imposing a lighter punishment than the statutory maximum, balancing justice with the accused's rehabilitation prospects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Dediyapada court sentenced the accused to imprisonment of Rs. 200 (or 5 days simple imprisonment in default) under IPC Section 294(1) for using obscene language in public, considering it was the accused's first offense, his poor economic background, and his express remorse and promise not to repeat such conduct. The court applied lenient sentencing principles by imposing a lighter punishment than the statutory maximum, balancing justice with the accused's rehabilitation prospects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DEDIAPADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case