Government of Gujarat vs JAYESHBHAI MUKESHBHAI VASAVA — 98/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR040001142026

e-Filing Number

07-08-2025

Filing Number

98/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

98/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEDIAPADA

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823004250777

Police Station

DEDIAPADA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

1.Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.JAYESHBHAI MUKESHBHAI VASAVA

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
15-Apr-2026

OrderView PDF

The court convicted the accused under the Motor Vehicles Act for a traffic offense and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 600 with an additional punishment of 5 days simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. The court considered the accused's financial condition, first-time offense, remorse, and future conduct assurances while imposing a lighter sentence than the maximum prescribed penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
15-Apr-2026

Disposed

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
12-Mar-2026

Process To Accused

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
10-Mar-2026

Process To Accused

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
03-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
22-Jan-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 98/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under the Motor Vehicles Act for a traffic offense and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 600 with an additional punishment of 5 days simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. The court considered the accused's financial condition, first-time offense, remorse, and future conduct assurances while imposing a lighter sentence than the maximum prescribed penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.