Government of Gujarat vs SANDIPBHAI DINESHBHAI VASAVA — 97/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,3,181. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR040001132026

e-Filing Number

01-07-2025

Filing Number

97/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

97/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEDIAPADA

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823004250323

Police Station

DEDIAPADA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,3,181

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

1.Government of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

1.SANDIPBHAI DINESHBHAI VASAVA

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
12-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 279/338 and Prohibition Act Sections 114(1)B for rash driving and causing hurt while under the influence of alcohol. Considering the accused's poverty, first-time offence, guilty plea, remorse, and family dependence, the court imposed a reduced sentence of ₹600 fine and imprisonment until the court's rising, rather than the maximum prescribed punishment, while also imposing a vehicle confiscation order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
12-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
10-Mar-2026

Process To Accused

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
03-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
22-Jan-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 97/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 279/338 and Prohibition Act Sections 114(1)B for rash driving and causing hurt while under the influence of alcohol. Considering the accused's poverty, first-time offence, guilty plea, remorse, and family dependence, the court imposed a reduced sentence of ₹600 fine and imprisonment until the court's rising, rather than the maximum prescribed punishment, while also imposing a vehicle confiscation order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.