Government of Gujarat vs AJAYBHAI ASHVINBHAI TADVI — 87/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,3,181. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR040001032026

e-Filing Number

19-05-2025

Filing Number

87/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

87/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEDIAPADA

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823004250183

Police Station

DEDIAPADA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,3,181

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

1.Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.AJAYBHAI ASHVINBHAI TADVI

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
15-Apr-2026

OrderView PDF

Case Summary The court found the accused guilty under IPC sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash/negligent driving causing injury). Considering the accused's voluntary confession, first-time offense, poor financial condition, and expression of remorse, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹600 (or 5 days simple imprisonment in default) instead of maximum punishment, balancing justice with rehabilitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
15-Apr-2026

Disposed

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
12-Mar-2026

Process To Accused

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
10-Mar-2026

Process To Accused

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
03-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
22-Jan-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 87/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court found the accused guilty under IPC sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash/negligent driving causing injury). Considering the accused's voluntary confession, first-time offense, poor financial condition, and expression of remorse, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹600 (or 5 days simple imprisonment in default) instead of maximum punishment, balancing justice with rehabilitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.