Government of Gujarat vs MANSUKHBHAI MANILALBHAI VASAVA Advocate - P U VASAVA — 74/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR040000902026

e-Filing Number

05-04-2025

Filing Number

74/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

74/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEDIAPADA

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823004250064

Police Station

DEDIAPADA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANSUKHBHAI MANILALBHAI VASAVA Advocate - P U VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 65(a) (related to the Prohibition Act) for committing an offense on the date, time, and place mentioned in the charge sheet, and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 or, in case of default, five days simple imprisonment. The court considered the accused's socio-economic circumstances, first-time offense, and voluntary confession as mitigating factors in awarding minimum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 74/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 65(a) (related to the Prohibition Act) for committing an offense on the date, time, and place mentioned in the charge sheet, and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 or, in case of default, five days simple imprisonment. The court considered the accused's socio-economic circumstances, first-time offense, and voluntary confession as mitigating factors in awarding minimum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case