Government of Gujarat vs MANSUKHBHAI MANILALBHAI VASAVA Advocate - P U VASAVA — 74/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR040000902026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

05-04-2025

Filing Number

74/2026

Filing Date

22-01-2026

Registration No

74/2026

Registration Date

22-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEDIAPADA

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823004250064

Police Station

DEDIAPADA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

MANSUKHBHAI MANILALBHAI VASAVA Advocate - P U VASAVA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

PLEA

10-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

03-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 65(a) (related to the Prohibition Act) for committing an offense on the date, time, and place mentioned in the charge sheet, and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 or, in case of default, five days simple imprisonment. The court considered the accused's socio-economic circumstances, first-time offense, and voluntary confession as mitigating factors in awarding minimum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 65(a) (related to the Prohibition Act) for committing an offense on the date, time, and place mentioned in the charge sheet, and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 or, in case of default, five days simple imprisonment. The court considered the accused's socio-economic circumstances, first-time offense, and voluntary confession as mitigating factors in awarding minimum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DEDIAPADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case