Government of Gujarat vs BIPINBHAI RATILALBHAI VASAVA — 66/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,3,181. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR040000822026

e-Filing Number

05-04-2025

Filing Number

66/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

66/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEDIAPADA

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823004250105

Police Station

DEDIAPADA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,3,181
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BIPINBHAI RATILALBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under IPC Sections 279 and 337 (rash and negligent driving causing hurt) and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 600 with additional penalties, while considering mitigating factors such as the accused being a first-time offender from a poor background and his expression of remorse and undertaking not to repeat the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 03-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 66/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under IPC Sections 279 and 337 (rash and negligent driving causing hurt) and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 600 with additional penalties, while considering mitigating factors such as the accused being a first-time offender from a poor background and his expression of remorse and undertaking not to repeat the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case