Government of Gujarat vs SUJALKUMAR RAMESHBHAI VASAVA — 64/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,3,181. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR040000802026

e-Filing Number

04-04-2025

Filing Number

64/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

64/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEDIAPADA

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823004250015

Police Station

DEDIAPADA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,3,181
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUJALKUMAR RAMESHBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under IPC Sections 185, 336, 337 and Prohibition Act Sections 66(1)(b) for drunk driving and causing danger to public safety, sentencing him to Rs. 600 fine and 5 days simple imprisonment. The court considered mitigating factors including the accused's first offense, poverty, family dependence, remorse, and prospects for rehabilitation in arriving at this lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 64/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under IPC Sections 185, 336, 337 and Prohibition Act Sections 66(1)(b) for drunk driving and causing danger to public safety, sentencing him to Rs. 600 fine and 5 days simple imprisonment. The court considered mitigating factors including the accused's first offense, poverty, family dependence, remorse, and prospects for rehabilitation in arriving at this lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case