Government of Gujarat vs AMARSINGBHAI DEVNABHAI VASAVA — 59/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,3,181. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 12th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR040000752026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

20-05-2025

Filing Number

59/2026

Filing Date

22-01-2026

Registration No

59/2026

Registration Date

22-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEDIAPADA

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823004250187

Police Station

DEDIAPADA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 185,3,181
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

AMARSINGBHAI DEVNABHAI VASAVA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

12-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

03-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
ORDER

The court convicted the accused under IPC Sections 154, 3, and 181 and Probation of Offenders Act Section 12(1)(b) for committing an offense during the period mentioned in the FIR. Considering the accused's voluntary confession, first-time offense, poor economic status, family dependence, remorse, and assurance against future crimes, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 600 fine and simple imprisonment until court rising, instead of rigorous imprisonment, while also disqualifying the accused from holding certain licenses under CrPC Section 437(a). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under IPC Sections 154, 3, and 181 and Probation of Offenders Act Section 12(1)(b) for committing an offense during the period mentioned in the FIR. Considering the accused's voluntary confession, first-time offense, poor economic status, family dependence, remorse, and assurance against future crimes, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 600 fine and simple imprisonment until court rising, instead of rigorous imprisonment, while also disqualifying the accused from holding certain licenses under CrPC Section 437(a). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DEDIAPADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case