Government of Gujarat vs PRADIPBHAI CHANDUBHAI PATEL — 46/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,3,181. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 12th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR040000622026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

09-07-2025

Filing Number

46/2026

Filing Date

21-01-2026

Registration No

46/2026

Registration Date

21-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEDIAPADA

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823004250424

Police Station

DEDIAPADA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 185,3,181
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

PRADIPBHAI CHANDUBHAI PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

12-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

03-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
ORDER

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 279/304A (rash/negligent driving causing death) and Probation of Offenders Act Section 4, imposing a fine of Rs. 600 with 5 days imprisonment as alternative punishment, considering the accused's poverty, first-time offense, family responsibilities, and remorse. The court exercised judicial discretion to impose a reduced sentence rather than the maximum punishment, balancing justice with the accused's circumstances and rehabilitation prospects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 279/304A (rash/negligent driving causing death) and Probation of Offenders Act Section 4, imposing a fine of Rs. 600 with 5 days imprisonment as alternative punishment, considering the accused's poverty, first-time offense, family responsibilities, and remorse. The court exercised judicial discretion to impose a reduced sentence rather than the maximum punishment, balancing justice with the accused's circumstances and rehabilitation prospects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DEDIAPADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case