Government of Gujarat vs VIRENDRASINH SAJJANSINH VASAVA — 44/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,3,181. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 15th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR040000602026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

09-07-2025

Filing Number

44/2026

Filing Date

21-01-2026

Registration No

44/2026

Registration Date

21-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEDIAPADA

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823004250426

Police Station

DEDIAPADA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 185,3,181
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

VIRENDRASINH SAJJANSINH VASAVA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

15-04-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

10-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

03-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

15-04-2026
ORDER

The court convicted the accused under IPC Sections 154, 3, and 181 as well as Probation Act Section 66(1)(b), and sentenced him to six months imprisonment with a fine of ₹600 (or additional five days imprisonment in default). Considering the accused's poverty, first-time offense, confession, remorse, and family dependence, the court reduced the sentence to the minimum prescribed punishment rather than imposing the maximum penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under IPC Sections 154, 3, and 181 as well as Probation Act Section 66(1)(b), and sentenced him to six months imprisonment with a fine of ₹600 (or additional five days imprisonment in default). Considering the accused's poverty, first-time offense, confession, remorse, and family dependence, the court reduced the sentence to the minimum prescribed punishment rather than imposing the maximum penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DEDIAPADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case