THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs VISHESHBHAI JAGDISHBHAI SHARMA Advocate - G N VASAVA — 1883/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR030021332025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1883/2025
Filing Date
06-12-2025
Registration No
1883/2025
Registration Date
06-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823021250327
Police Station
SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
VISHESHBHAI JAGDISHBHAI SHARMA Advocate - G N VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
ORDER
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 07-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 03-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Sagbara First Class Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, for drug-related offenses. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime, and considering it was a first offense, his family responsibilities as the sole earner, and applicable Supreme Court principles on lenient sentencing for poor/marginalized persons, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine with 2 days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Sagbara First Class Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, for drug-related offenses. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime, and considering it was a first offense, his family responsibilities as the sole earner, and applicable Supreme Court principles on lenient sentencing for poor/marginalized persons, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine with 2 days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts