THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs VISHESHBHAI JAGDISHBHAI SHARMA Advocate - G N VASAVA — 1883/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR030021332025
Filing Number
1883/2025
Filing Date
06-Dec-2025
Registration No
1883/2025
Registration Date
06-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 03-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823021250327
Police Station
SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.VISHESHBHAI JAGDISHBHAI SHARMA Advocate - G N VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary The Sagbara First Class Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, for drug-related offenses. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime, and considering it was a first offense, his family responsibilities as the sole earner, and applicable Supreme Court principles on lenient sentencing for poor/marginalized persons, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine with 2 days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Order
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1883/2025
Case Summary The Sagbara First Class Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, for drug-related offenses. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime, and considering it was a first offense, his family responsibilities as the sole earner, and applicable Supreme Court principles on lenient sentencing for poor/marginalized persons, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine with 2 days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts