THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ASHVINBHAI RAMJIBHAI VASAVA Advocate - R A VASAVA — 1882/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR030021322025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1882/2025
Filing Date
06-12-2025
Registration No
1882/2025
Registration Date
06-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823021250486
Police Station
SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ASHVINBHAI RAMJIBHAI VASAVA Advocate - R A VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
ORDER
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 07-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 03-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sagbara First Class Magistrate Court convicted the defendant Ashvinbhai Ramjibhai Vasava under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, for a drug-related offense. The defendant voluntarily confessed to the charge, and considering it was his first offense, his responsibility as a family breadwinner, and relevant judicial precedents favoring lenient sentences, the court imposed a lenient punishment of ₹200 fine or 2 days simple imprisonment in default, along with forfeiture of contraband material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Sagbara First Class Magistrate Court convicted the defendant Ashvinbhai Ramjibhai Vasava under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, for a drug-related offense. The defendant voluntarily confessed to the charge, and considering it was his first offense, his responsibility as a family breadwinner, and relevant judicial precedents favoring lenient sentences, the court imposed a lenient punishment of ₹200 fine or 2 days simple imprisonment in default, along with forfeiture of contraband material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts