THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ASHVINBHAI RAMJIBHAI VASAVA Advocate - R A VASAVA — 1882/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR030021322025
Filing Number
1882/2025
Filing Date
06-Dec-2025
Registration No
1882/2025
Registration Date
06-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 03-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823021250486
Police Station
SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.ASHVINBHAI RAMJIBHAI VASAVA Advocate - R A VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Sagbara First Class Magistrate Court convicted the defendant Ashvinbhai Ramjibhai Vasava under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, for a drug-related offense. The defendant voluntarily confessed to the charge, and considering it was his first offense, his responsibility as a family breadwinner, and relevant judicial precedents favoring lenient sentences, the court imposed a lenient punishment of ₹200 fine or 2 days simple imprisonment in default, along with forfeiture of contraband material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Order
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1882/2025
Summary The Sagbara First Class Magistrate Court convicted the defendant Ashvinbhai Ramjibhai Vasava under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, for a drug-related offense. The defendant voluntarily confessed to the charge, and considering it was his first offense, his responsibility as a family breadwinner, and relevant judicial precedents favoring lenient sentences, the court imposed a lenient punishment of ₹200 fine or 2 days simple imprisonment in default, along with forfeiture of contraband material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts