THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs YOGESHBHAI FATUBHAI TADIV Advocate - G N VASAVA — 1861/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR030021112025
Filing Number
1861/2025
Filing Date
05-Dec-2025
Registration No
1861/2025
Registration Date
05-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 03-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823021251149
Police Station
SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.YOGESHBHAI FATUBHAI TADIV Advocate - G N VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Sagbara Judicial Magistrate Court convicted Yogeshbhai Fatubhai Tadvi under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (drug-related offense). The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime, and the court, considering it his first offense, his financial hardship, and his responsibilities as a laborer, imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine or two days simple imprisonment in lieu. Non-valuable contraband was ordered destroyed, and valuable seized items were ordered forfeited or returned as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Order
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1861/2025
Summary The Sagbara Judicial Magistrate Court convicted Yogeshbhai Fatubhai Tadvi under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (drug-related offense). The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime, and the court, considering it his first offense, his financial hardship, and his responsibilities as a laborer, imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine or two days simple imprisonment in lieu. Non-valuable contraband was ordered destroyed, and valuable seized items were ordered forfeited or returned as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts