THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SANDIPBHAI JHALABHAI GAVIT Advocate - R A VASAVA — 1733/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR030019512025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1733/2025

Filing Date

15-10-2025

Registration No

1733/2025

Registration Date

15-10-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

1182302125987

Police Station

SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 281,
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 3,181,

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SANDIPBHAI JHALABHAI GAVIT Advocate - R A VASAVA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

10-04-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

10-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

03-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

30-12-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary The JMFC Sagbara court acquitted accused Sandeepbhai Zhalabhai Gavit of charges under IPC Section 281 (rash/negligent driving) and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 3 and 181 (driving without license), finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that while the accused was arrested at a checkpoint on 16/07/2025, the panchnama witnesses provided no corroborating evidence, no independent eyewitnesses testified to rash driving, and critical elements of the offense remained unproven despite the investigator's testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The JMFC Sagbara court acquitted accused Sandeepbhai Zhalabhai Gavit of charges under IPC Section 281 (rash/negligent driving) and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 3 and 181 (driving without license), finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that while the accused was arrested at a checkpoint on 16/07/2025, the panchnama witnesses provided no corroborating evidence, no independent eyewitnesses testified to rash driving, and critical elements of the offense remained unproven despite the investigator's testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case