THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SANDIPBHAI JHALABHAI GAVIT Advocate - R A VASAVA — 1733/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR030019512025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1733/2025
Filing Date
15-10-2025
Registration No
1733/2025
Registration Date
15-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
1182302125987
Police Station
SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SANDIPBHAI JHALABHAI GAVIT Advocate - R A VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 03-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 30-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The JMFC Sagbara court acquitted accused Sandeepbhai Zhalabhai Gavit of charges under IPC Section 281 (rash/negligent driving) and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 3 and 181 (driving without license), finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that while the accused was arrested at a checkpoint on 16/07/2025, the panchnama witnesses provided no corroborating evidence, no independent eyewitnesses testified to rash driving, and critical elements of the offense remained unproven despite the investigator's testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The JMFC Sagbara court acquitted accused Sandeepbhai Zhalabhai Gavit of charges under IPC Section 281 (rash/negligent driving) and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 3 and 181 (driving without license), finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that while the accused was arrested at a checkpoint on 16/07/2025, the panchnama witnesses provided no corroborating evidence, no independent eyewitnesses testified to rash driving, and critical elements of the offense remained unproven despite the investigator's testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts