THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs JINABEN W/O RAMESHBHAI JAYSINGBHAI VASAVA Advocate - G N VASAVA — 1723/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR030019412025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1723/2025
Filing Date
14-10-2025
Registration No
1723/2025
Registration Date
14-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823021250863
Police Station
SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
JINABEN W/O RAMESHBHAI JAYSINGBHAI VASAVA Advocate - G N VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 03-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 06-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The JMFC Sagbara court acquitted accused Zinaaben Rameshbhai Vasava of charges under Section 65AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, for allegedly possessing 3 liters of illegal liquor worth ₹600. The court found that while the prosecution presented police evidence, it lacked independent corroborating witnesses and credible evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused knowingly possessed the contraband, thereby granting her the benefit of doubt under criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The JMFC Sagbara court acquitted accused Zinaaben Rameshbhai Vasava of charges under Section 65AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, for allegedly possessing 3 liters of illegal liquor worth ₹600. The court found that while the prosecution presented police evidence, it lacked independent corroborating witnesses and credible evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused knowingly possessed the contraband, thereby granting her the benefit of doubt under criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts