THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SUNIL KHEMAJI TADVI Advocate - G N VASAVA — 1704/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR030019222025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1704/2025
Filing Date
13-10-2025
Registration No
1704/2025
Registration Date
13-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823021250453
Police Station
SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SUNIL KHEMAJI TADVI Advocate - G N VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 03-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 06-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sagbara acquitted accused Sunilbhai Khemjibhai Tadvi of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65AA (liquor possession) due to insufficient corroborating evidence. The court found that while police recovered alleged contraband, the prosecution failed to establish the accused's knowing possession through independent witness testimony, as the panchnama (seizure record) witnesses provided no supporting evidence and no other credible witnesses linked the accused to the crime beyond police testimony alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sagbara acquitted accused Sunilbhai Khemjibhai Tadvi of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65AA (liquor possession) due to insufficient corroborating evidence. The court found that while police recovered alleged contraband, the prosecution failed to establish the accused's knowing possession through independent witness testimony, as the panchnama (seizure record) witnesses provided no supporting evidence and no other credible witnesses linked the accused to the crime beyond police testimony alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts