THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SUNIL KHEMAJI TADVI Advocate - G N VASAVA — 1704/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR030019222025
Filing Number
1704/2025
Filing Date
13-Oct-2025
Registration No
1704/2025
Registration Date
13-Oct-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823021250453
Police Station
SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUNIL KHEMAJI TADVI Advocate - G N VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sagbara acquitted accused Sunilbhai Khemjibhai Tadvi of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65AA (liquor possession) due to insufficient corroborating evidence. The court found that while police recovered alleged contraband, the prosecution failed to establish the accused's knowing possession through independent witness testimony, as the panchnama (seizure record) witnesses provided no supporting evidence and no other credible witnesses linked the accused to the crime beyond police testimony alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1704/2025
Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sagbara acquitted accused Sunilbhai Khemjibhai Tadvi of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65AA (liquor possession) due to insufficient corroborating evidence. The court found that while police recovered alleged contraband, the prosecution failed to establish the accused's knowing possession through independent witness testimony, as the panchnama (seizure record) witnesses provided no supporting evidence and no other credible witnesses linked the accused to the crime beyond police testimony alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts