THE STATE IOF GUJARAT vs NITESH LAKSHMAN PADVI Advocate - J R JAVRE — 1687/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR030019052025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1687/2025

Filing Date

13-10-2025

Registration No

1687/2025

Registration Date

13-10-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823021250965

Police Station

SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 281,
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 3,181

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE IOF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

NITESH LAKSHMAN PADVI Advocate - J R JAVRE

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

10-04-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

10-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

03-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

30-12-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 1687/2025, JMFC Sagbara Court Decision: The accused, Niteshbhai Lakshmanbhai Padvi, was acquitted of charges under IPC Section 281 and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 3 & 181 for rash/negligent driving without a valid license. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. While the investigating officer testified, the panch witnesses who conducted the site inspection provided no corroborating evidence supporting the FIR allegations. The court found no independent witness testimony confirming the accused was driving the vehicle recklessly or without a license. Applying established criminal jurisprudence principles—that the burden of proof rests entirely on the prosecution and doubt must benefit the accused—the court held the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove the essential elements of rash/negligent driving endangering life. The benefit of doubt was granted to the accused, resulting in acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 1687/2025, JMFC Sagbara Court Decision: The accused, Niteshbhai Lakshmanbhai Padvi, was acquitted of charges under IPC Section 281 and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 3 & 181 for rash/negligent driving without a valid license. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. While the investigating officer testified, the panch witnesses who conducted the site inspection provided no corroborating evidence supporting the FIR allegations. The court found no independent witness testimony confirming the accused was driving the vehicle recklessly or without a license. Applying established criminal jurisprudence principles—that the burden of proof rests entirely on the prosecution and doubt must benefit the accused—the court held the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove the essential elements of rash/negligent driving endangering life. The benefit of doubt was granted to the accused, resulting in acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case