THE STATE IOF GUJARAT vs NITESH LAKSHMAN PADVI Advocate - J R JAVRE — 1687/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR030019052025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1687/2025
Filing Date
13-10-2025
Registration No
1687/2025
Registration Date
13-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823021250965
Police Station
SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE IOF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
NITESH LAKSHMAN PADVI Advocate - J R JAVRE
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 03-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 30-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 1687/2025, JMFC Sagbara Court Decision: The accused, Niteshbhai Lakshmanbhai Padvi, was acquitted of charges under IPC Section 281 and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 3 & 181 for rash/negligent driving without a valid license. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. While the investigating officer testified, the panch witnesses who conducted the site inspection provided no corroborating evidence supporting the FIR allegations. The court found no independent witness testimony confirming the accused was driving the vehicle recklessly or without a license. Applying established criminal jurisprudence principles—that the burden of proof rests entirely on the prosecution and doubt must benefit the accused—the court held the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove the essential elements of rash/negligent driving endangering life. The benefit of doubt was granted to the accused, resulting in acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 1687/2025, JMFC Sagbara Court Decision: The accused, Niteshbhai Lakshmanbhai Padvi, was acquitted of charges under IPC Section 281 and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 3 & 181 for rash/negligent driving without a valid license. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. While the investigating officer testified, the panch witnesses who conducted the site inspection provided no corroborating evidence supporting the FIR allegations. The court found no independent witness testimony confirming the accused was driving the vehicle recklessly or without a license. Applying established criminal jurisprudence principles—that the burden of proof rests entirely on the prosecution and doubt must benefit the accused—the court held the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove the essential elements of rash/negligent driving endangering life. The benefit of doubt was granted to the accused, resulting in acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts