THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs LAXMIBEN W/O JITENDRABHAI GIRDHARBHAI VASAVA Advocate - N K VASAVA — 1680/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR030018982025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1680/2025

Filing Date

10-10-2025

Registration No

1680/2025

Registration Date

10-10-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823021250961

Police Station

SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

LAXMIBEN W/O JITENDRABHAI GIRDHARBHAI VASAVA Advocate - N K VASAVA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

10-04-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

10-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

03-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

06-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sagbara acquitted defendant Lakshmiben Jitendrabhai Tadvi of charges under Section 65AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 for alleged possession of 3 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹600. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the panchayat witnesses (panchs) did not corroborate the seizure claim, no independent witnesses supported the allegations, and police evidence alone—without independent corroborating evidence—was insufficient to establish guilt under criminal jurisprudence principles. The defendant was acquitted with benefit of doubt and ordered released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sagbara acquitted defendant Lakshmiben Jitendrabhai Tadvi of charges under Section 65AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 for alleged possession of 3 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹600. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the panchayat witnesses (panchs) did not corroborate the seizure claim, no independent witnesses supported the allegations, and police evidence alone—without independent corroborating evidence—was insufficient to establish guilt under criminal jurisprudence principles. The defendant was acquitted with benefit of doubt and ordered released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case