THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs LAXMIBEN W/O JITENDRABHAI GIRDHARBHAI VASAVA Advocate - N K VASAVA — 1680/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR030018982025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1680/2025
Filing Date
10-10-2025
Registration No
1680/2025
Registration Date
10-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823021250961
Police Station
SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
LAXMIBEN W/O JITENDRABHAI GIRDHARBHAI VASAVA Advocate - N K VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 03-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 06-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sagbara acquitted defendant Lakshmiben Jitendrabhai Tadvi of charges under Section 65AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 for alleged possession of 3 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹600. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the panchayat witnesses (panchs) did not corroborate the seizure claim, no independent witnesses supported the allegations, and police evidence alone—without independent corroborating evidence—was insufficient to establish guilt under criminal jurisprudence principles. The defendant was acquitted with benefit of doubt and ordered released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sagbara acquitted defendant Lakshmiben Jitendrabhai Tadvi of charges under Section 65AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 for alleged possession of 3 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹600. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the panchayat witnesses (panchs) did not corroborate the seizure claim, no independent witnesses supported the allegations, and police evidence alone—without independent corroborating evidence—was insufficient to establish guilt under criminal jurisprudence principles. The defendant was acquitted with benefit of doubt and ordered released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts