THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs GUNAVANTIBEN W/O SANJAYBHAI KEMUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - N K VASAVA — 1663/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR030018812025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1663/2025
Filing Date
10-10-2025
Registration No
1663/2025
Registration Date
10-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823021250869
Police Station
SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
GUNAVANTIBEN W/O SANJAYBHAI KEMUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - N K VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 03-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 06-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The JMFC Sagbara court acquitted Gunvantiben W/O Sanjayabhai Kemubhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65AA) for alleged possession of 3 liters of country liquor worth ₹600. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the evidence from witnesses (panchas) and investigating officer lacked independent corroboration, and there was no credible evidence establishing the accused's knowing possession of the seized liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The JMFC Sagbara court acquitted Gunvantiben W/O Sanjayabhai Kemubhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65AA) for alleged possession of 3 liters of country liquor worth ₹600. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the evidence from witnesses (panchas) and investigating officer lacked independent corroboration, and there was no credible evidence establishing the accused's knowing possession of the seized liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts