THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DVARKABEN W/O NARESHBHAI TADVI Advocate - J R JAVRE — 1580/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR030017802025
Filing Number
1580/2025
Filing Date
23-Sep-2025
Registration No
1580/2025
Registration Date
23-Sep-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823021250726
Police Station
SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.DVARKABEN W/O NARESHBHAI TADVI Advocate - J R JAVRE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Judgment Summary - Case No. 1580/2025 The court acquitted defendant Dwarkaaben Nareshbhai Tadvi of charges under Section 65AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, for alleged possession of illegal liquor. The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as witness testimonies lacked independent corroboration and material evidence was inadequately documented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1580/2025
Judgment Summary - Case No. 1580/2025 The court acquitted defendant Dwarkaaben Nareshbhai Tadvi of charges under Section 65AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, for alleged possession of illegal liquor. The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as witness testimonies lacked independent corroboration and material evidence was inadequately documented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts