THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SABBIRHUSEN SIRAJ MOHD BALUCHI Advocate - R A VASAVA — 1488/2025
Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [section 1 18] Section 12A. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR030016662025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1488/2025
Filing Date
02-09-2025
Registration No
1488/2025
Registration Date
02-09-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823021250689
Police Station
SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SABBIRHUSEN SIRAJ MOHD BALUCHI Advocate - R A VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 03-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 30-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 1488/2025 | Gujarat State v. Shabir Husain Siraj Mohammad Balochi Court Decision: The accused was acquitted and discharged of charges under the Bombay (Gujarat) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, Section 12A. The court found insufficient corroborating evidence from independent witnesses to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the prosecution's case relied primarily on police testimony unsupported by credible independent evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 1488/2025 | Gujarat State v. Shabir Husain Siraj Mohammad Balochi Court Decision: The accused was acquitted and discharged of charges under the Bombay (Gujarat) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, Section 12A. The court found insufficient corroborating evidence from independent witnesses to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the prosecution's case relied primarily on police testimony unsupported by credible independent evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts