THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SABBIRHUSEN SIRAJ MOHD BALUCHI Advocate - R A VASAVA — 1488/2025
Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [Section 1 18] Section 12A. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR030016662025
Filing Number
1488/2025
Filing Date
02-Sep-2025
Registration No
1488/2025
Registration Date
02-Sep-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823021250689
Police Station
SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SABBIRHUSEN SIRAJ MOHD BALUCHI Advocate - R A VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 1488/2025 | Gujarat State v. Shabir Husain Siraj Mohammad Balochi Court Decision: The accused was acquitted and discharged of charges under the Bombay (Gujarat) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, Section 12A. The court found insufficient corroborating evidence from independent witnesses to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the prosecution's case relied primarily on police testimony unsupported by credible independent evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1488/2025
Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 1488/2025 | Gujarat State v. Shabir Husain Siraj Mohammad Balochi Court Decision: The accused was acquitted and discharged of charges under the Bombay (Gujarat) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, Section 12A. The court found insufficient corroborating evidence from independent witnesses to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the prosecution's case relied primarily on police testimony unsupported by credible independent evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts