THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ASHOK SHIVDAS JADAV Advocate - R A VASAVA — 1457/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR030016262025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1457/2025
Filing Date
19-08-2025
Registration No
1457/2025
Registration Date
19-08-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823021251139
Police Station
SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ASHOK SHIVDAS JADAV Advocate - R A VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
ORDER
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 27-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 31-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 19-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sagbara First Class Judicial Magistrate Court convicted Ashok Shivdas Jadav under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, for a drug-related offense. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime, and considering this was his first offense, his status as a laborer with family responsibilities, and relevant Supreme Court and High Court principles favoring lenient sentencing for economically disadvantaged offenders, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine with 2 days simple imprisonment in the alternative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Sagbara First Class Judicial Magistrate Court convicted Ashok Shivdas Jadav under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, for a drug-related offense. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime, and considering this was his first offense, his status as a laborer with family responsibilities, and relevant Supreme Court and High Court principles favoring lenient sentencing for economically disadvantaged offenders, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine with 2 days simple imprisonment in the alternative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts