THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ANIL PRATAPSING VALVI Advocate - Y R VALVI — 1430/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR030015972025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1430/2025
Filing Date
06-08-2025
Registration No
1430/2025
Registration Date
06-08-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823021250737
Police Station
SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ANIL PRATAPSING VALVI Advocate - Y R VALVI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 03-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 06-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sagbara acquitted accused Anilbhai Prataapsingh Valvi of charges under Indian Penal Code Section 281 (rash/negligent driving) and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 3 and 181 (driving without license), giving him benefit of doubt. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving recklessly or negligently in a manner endangering human life, lacking independent corroborating witness testimony despite having panch witnesses present at the spot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sagbara acquitted accused Anilbhai Prataapsingh Valvi of charges under Indian Penal Code Section 281 (rash/negligent driving) and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 3 and 181 (driving without license), giving him benefit of doubt. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving recklessly or negligently in a manner endangering human life, lacking independent corroborating witness testimony despite having panch witnesses present at the spot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts