THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SHANTILAL RAVA PADVI Advocate - V R VALVI — 1280/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR030014372025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1280/2025

Filing Date

31-07-2025

Registration No

1280/2025

Registration Date

31-07-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823021250106

Police Station

SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 281,
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 3,181,

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SHANTILAL RAVA PADVI Advocate - V R VALVI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

10-04-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

10-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

03-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

30-12-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sagbara, acquitted Shantilal Bhai Ravabal Padvi of charges under IPC Section 281 and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 3 and 181 for rash/negligent driving without a valid license. The court found the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the panchnama (site inspection) witnesses could not corroborate the allegations and no independent evidence proved the accused was driving recklessly or dangerously. The defendant benefited from the presumption of innocence due to insufficient reliable and credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sagbara, acquitted Shantilal Bhai Ravabal Padvi of charges under IPC Section 281 and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 3 and 181 for rash/negligent driving without a valid license. The court found the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the panchnama (site inspection) witnesses could not corroborate the allegations and no independent evidence proved the accused was driving recklessly or dangerously. The defendant benefited from the presumption of innocence due to insufficient reliable and credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case