THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KUSUMBEN W/O GOVINDBHAI VASANTBHAI VASAVA Advocate - G N VASAVA — 1184/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR030013392025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1184/2025
Filing Date
28-07-2025
Registration No
1184/2025
Registration Date
28-07-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823021250125
Police Station
SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KUSUMBEN W/O GOVINDBHAI VASANTBHAI VASAVA Advocate - G N VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 11-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 07-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused, Kusumbben Govindbhai Vasava, of charges under Section 65AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment emphasizes that while allegedly illicit liquor was recovered during a raid, there was insufficient corroborating evidence from independent witnesses to establish the accused's possession or knowledge of the contraband, and the prosecution's reliance solely on police testimony without independent corroboration was inadequate to meet the burden of proof in criminal law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused, Kusumbben Govindbhai Vasava, of charges under Section 65AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment emphasizes that while allegedly illicit liquor was recovered during a raid, there was insufficient corroborating evidence from independent witnesses to establish the accused's possession or knowledge of the contraband, and the prosecution's reliance solely on police testimony without independent corroboration was inadequate to meet the burden of proof in criminal law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts