THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KUSUMBEN W/O GOVINDBHAI VASANTBHAI VASAVA Advocate - G N VASAVA — 1184/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR030013392025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1184/2025

Filing Date

28-07-2025

Registration No

1184/2025

Registration Date

28-07-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823021250125

Police Station

SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

KUSUMBEN W/O GOVINDBHAI VASANTBHAI VASAVA Advocate - G N VASAVA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

10-04-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

10-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

11-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

07-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court acquitted the accused, Kusumbben Govindbhai Vasava, of charges under Section 65AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment emphasizes that while allegedly illicit liquor was recovered during a raid, there was insufficient corroborating evidence from independent witnesses to establish the accused's possession or knowledge of the contraband, and the prosecution's reliance solely on police testimony without independent corroboration was inadequate to meet the burden of proof in criminal law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused, Kusumbben Govindbhai Vasava, of charges under Section 65AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment emphasizes that while allegedly illicit liquor was recovered during a raid, there was insufficient corroborating evidence from independent witnesses to establish the accused's possession or knowledge of the contraband, and the prosecution's reliance solely on police testimony without independent corroboration was inadequate to meet the burden of proof in criminal law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case