THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ANILBHAI SAYSINGBHAI RATHAVA — 459/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR030005332026

e-Filing Number

07-01-2026

Filing Number

459/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

459/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823021251438

Police Station

SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANILBHAI SAYSINGBHAI RATHAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sagbara Judicial Magistrate convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, based on his voluntary confession. Considering it as a first offense, the accused's role as a laborer responsible for family support, and principles of leniency established by higher courts, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine or 2 days simple imprisonment in the alternative, along with confiscation of contraband materials as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 459/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sagbara Judicial Magistrate convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, based on his voluntary confession. Considering it as a first offense, the accused's role as a laborer responsible for family support, and principles of leniency established by higher courts, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine or 2 days simple imprisonment in the alternative, along with confiscation of contraband materials as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case