THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ANKIT ABHIMANYU VASAVE — 457/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 3,181,185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR030005312026

Filing Number

457/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

457/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823021251189

Police Station

SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 3,181,185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANKIT ABHIMANYU VASAVE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Sagbara Judicial Magistrate convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 181 and 185 for drunk driving. The court sentenced him to imprisonment until the court rises and imposed a fine of ₹1,000, considering his voluntary confession, first-time offense, poor financial condition, and family responsibilities as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 457/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sagbara Judicial Magistrate convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 181 and 185 for drunk driving. The court sentenced him to imprisonment until the court rises and imposed a fine of ₹1,000, considering his voluntary confession, first-time offense, poor financial condition, and family responsibilities as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case