State Government of Gujarat vs PRATIKBHAI JAGDISHBHAI VASAVA — 452/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,181,3. Status: Process To Accused. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

Process To Accused Next hearing 06-May-2026 this date has passed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR030005262026

e-Filing Number

07-01-2026

Filing Number

452/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

452/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823021251485

Police Station

SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,181,3

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

1.State Government of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

1.PRATIKBHAI JAGDISHBHAI VASAVA

Case History

06-May-2026

Next hearingPending
15-Apr-2026

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
14-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

Summary: The defendant was convicted under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 181 and 185 for drunk driving. The court imposed a fine of ₹1,000 and imprisonment until the rising of the court (concurrent sentences on both motor vehicle charges), with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. The lenient sentence was granted considering the defendant's guilty plea, first offense, poor economic condition, and family responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
10-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
10-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 452/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The defendant was convicted under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 181 and 185 for drunk driving. The court imposed a fine of ₹1,000 and imprisonment until the rising of the court (concurrent sentences on both motor vehicle charges), with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. The lenient sentence was granted considering the defendant's guilty plea, first offense, poor economic condition, and family responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.