THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PRAHALADBHAI PARSOTTAMBHAI VASAVA — 450/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR030005232026

e-Filing Number

09-10-2025

Filing Number

450/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

450/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823021251136

Police Station

SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRAHALADBHAI PARSOTTAMBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court convicted the defendant under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 for drug-related offense, while discharging him under Section 85(1). The defendant pleaded guilty voluntarily, and considering his first offense, laborer status, remorse, and relevant Supreme Court precedents on lenient sentencing, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹200 or simple imprisonment for 2 days as an alternative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 450/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the defendant under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 for drug-related offense, while discharging him under Section 85(1). The defendant pleaded guilty voluntarily, and considering his first offense, laborer status, remorse, and relevant Supreme Court precedents on lenient sentencing, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹200 or simple imprisonment for 2 days as an alternative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case