THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PIYUSHBHAI DINESHBHAI VASAVA — 445/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,181,3. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR030005182026

e-Filing Number

07-01-2026

Filing Number

445/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

445/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823021251496

Police Station

SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,181,3
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PIYUSHBHAI DINESHBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sagbara Judicial Magistrate convicted the accused Piyushbhai under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(B) and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 181 and 185 for drunk driving. The court sentenced him to imprisonment until court rising with a fine of ₹1,000, imposing lenient punishment considering his voluntary confession, first-time offense, poor economic status as a laborer, and family support responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 445/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sagbara Judicial Magistrate convicted the accused Piyushbhai under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(B) and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 181 and 185 for drunk driving. The court sentenced him to imprisonment until court rising with a fine of ₹1,000, imposing lenient punishment considering his voluntary confession, first-time offense, poor economic status as a laborer, and family support responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case