THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RAKESHKUMAR REMUBHAI VASAVA — 441/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,181,3. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR030005142026
e-Filing Number
07-01-2026
Filing Number
441/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
441/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823021251343
Police Station
SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Respondent(s)
RAKESHKUMAR REMUBHAI VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PLEA
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | PLEA |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Sagbara First Class Judicial Magistrate convicted Rakeshkumar Remubhai Vasava under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 66(1)(b)) and Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Sections 181 and 185) for drunk driving. The accused voluntarily confessed to the charges, and the court considered his impoverished financial condition, first-time offence, and family responsibilities. The court sentenced him to simple imprisonment until the rising of court (concurrent) and imposed a ₹1,000 fine, with an alternative of two days' simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, applying lenient sentencing principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Sagbara First Class Judicial Magistrate convicted Rakeshkumar Remubhai Vasava under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 66(1)(b)) and Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Sections 181 and 185) for drunk driving. The accused voluntarily confessed to the charges, and the court considered his impoverished financial condition, first-time offence, and family responsibilities. The court sentenced him to simple imprisonment until the rising of court (concurrent) and imposed a ₹1,000 fine, with an alternative of two days' simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, applying lenient sentencing principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts