THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RAKESHKUMAR REMUBHAI VASAVA — 441/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,181,3. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR030005142026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

07-01-2026

Filing Number

441/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

441/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823021251343

Police Station

SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 185,181,3
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

RAKESHKUMAR REMUBHAI VASAVA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

PLEA

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary: The Sagbara First Class Judicial Magistrate convicted Rakeshkumar Remubhai Vasava under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 66(1)(b)) and Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Sections 181 and 185) for drunk driving. The accused voluntarily confessed to the charges, and the court considered his impoverished financial condition, first-time offence, and family responsibilities. The court sentenced him to simple imprisonment until the rising of court (concurrent) and imposed a ₹1,000 fine, with an alternative of two days' simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, applying lenient sentencing principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sagbara First Class Judicial Magistrate convicted Rakeshkumar Remubhai Vasava under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 66(1)(b)) and Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Sections 181 and 185) for drunk driving. The accused voluntarily confessed to the charges, and the court considered his impoverished financial condition, first-time offence, and family responsibilities. The court sentenced him to simple imprisonment until the rising of court (concurrent) and imposed a ₹1,000 fine, with an alternative of two days' simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, applying lenient sentencing principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case