THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SHAILESHBHAI SHANKARBHAI TADVI — 440/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR030005132026

e-Filing Number

07-08-2025

Filing Number

440/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

440/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823021250762

Police Station

SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAILESHBHAI SHANKARBHAI TADVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused guilty under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and sentenced him to a fine of ₹200 with two days simple imprisonment in default, considering it his first offense, his remorse, family responsibilities, and his status as a laborer. The court applied lenient sentencing principles established by the Gujarat High Court and Supreme Court, recognizing that poverty should not be grounds for imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 440/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused guilty under Section 66(1)(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and sentenced him to a fine of ₹200 with two days simple imprisonment in default, considering it his first offense, his remorse, family responsibilities, and his status as a laborer. The court applied lenient sentencing principles established by the Gujarat High Court and Supreme Court, recognizing that poverty should not be grounds for imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case