THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AKASHBHAI KANTILALBHAI VASAVA — 436/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR030005092026

e-Filing Number

07-01-2026

Filing Number

436/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

436/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823021251313

Police Station

SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AKASHBHAI KANTILALBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused, Akashbhai Kantilalbhai Vasava, guilty under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code, 2023 (rash or negligent conduct with respect to fire or explosive substance). The accused voluntarily confessed to the charge, and considering mitigating factors including his status as a laborer, financial inability to pay heavy fines, and that it was his first offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of a ₹200 fine or two days' simple imprisonment in the alternative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 436/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused, Akashbhai Kantilalbhai Vasava, guilty under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code, 2023 (rash or negligent conduct with respect to fire or explosive substance). The accused voluntarily confessed to the charge, and considering mitigating factors including his status as a laborer, financial inability to pay heavy fines, and that it was his first offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of a ₹200 fine or two days' simple imprisonment in the alternative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case