THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KAPURKUMAR RAMANBHAI VASAVA — 430/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,181,3. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR030005032026

e-Filing Number

07-01-2026

Filing Number

430/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

430/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823021251691

Police Station

SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,181,3
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAPURKUMAR RAMANBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sagbara Judicial Magistrate First Class convicted the defendant Kapurkumar Ramanbhai Vasava under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 181 and 185 for drink-driving. The court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹1,000 fine and simple imprisonment until court rising (instead of stricter penalties) considering the defendant's poverty, first-time offense, and family support responsibilities, citing Supreme Court principles against imprisoning the poor merely for inability to pay fines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 430/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sagbara Judicial Magistrate First Class convicted the defendant Kapurkumar Ramanbhai Vasava under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 181 and 185 for drink-driving. The court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹1,000 fine and simple imprisonment until court rising (instead of stricter penalties) considering the defendant's poverty, first-time offense, and family support responsibilities, citing Supreme Court principles against imprisoning the poor merely for inability to pay fines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case