THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ROSHANBHAI DILIPABHAI VASAVA Advocate - P V PADVI — 281/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR030003222026

e-Filing Number

07-01-2026

Filing Number

281/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

281/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823021251243

Police Station

SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ROSHANBHAI DILIPABHAI VASAVA Advocate - P V PADVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused guilty under Section 223 of the Indian Penal Code, 2023, after he voluntarily confessed to the crime. Considering mitigating factors including his first offense, family responsibilities, laborer status, poverty, and remorse, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine with 2 days simple imprisonment in the alternative. The judgment applied established principles from Gujarat High Court precedents regarding lenient sentencing for economically disadvantaged offenders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 281/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused guilty under Section 223 of the Indian Penal Code, 2023, after he voluntarily confessed to the crime. Considering mitigating factors including his first offense, family responsibilities, laborer status, poverty, and remorse, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine with 2 days simple imprisonment in the alternative. The judgment applied established principles from Gujarat High Court precedents regarding lenient sentencing for economically disadvantaged offenders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case