THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RAJESHBHAI KOTHAMASINGBHAI VASAVA Advocate - R A VASAVA — 279/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR030003202026

e-Filing Number

07-01-2026

Filing Number

279/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

279/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823021251316

Police Station

SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJESHBHAI KOTHAMASINGBHAI VASAVA Advocate - R A VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sagbara Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the defendant Rajesh Bhai under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code, 2023 (rash or negligent conduct), and sentenced him to a fine of ₹200 or 2 days simple imprisonment in default, considering his voluntary confession, first-time offense, and financial hardship. The court applied leniency principles established by the Gujarat High Court and Supreme Court, given that the defendant is a laborer with family responsibilities and exhibited genuine remorse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 279/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sagbara Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the defendant Rajesh Bhai under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code, 2023 (rash or negligent conduct), and sentenced him to a fine of ₹200 or 2 days simple imprisonment in default, considering his voluntary confession, first-time offense, and financial hardship. The court applied leniency principles established by the Gujarat High Court and Supreme Court, given that the defendant is a laborer with family responsibilities and exhibited genuine remorse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case