THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs BHAVESHKUMAR RAGHUBHAI TADVI Advocate - T J VASAVA — 275/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR030003162026

e-Filing Number

09-10-2025

Filing Number

275/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

275/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823021251230

Police Station

SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHAVESHKUMAR RAGHUBHAI TADVI Advocate - T J VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sagbara First Class Magistrate Court convicted the accused, Bhaveshkumar Raghubbhai Tadvi, under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B) for drug-related offense. The court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine and 2 days simple imprisonment, considering it as the accused's first offense, his status as a laborer, his remorse, and applicable Supreme Court principles against imprisoning individuals unable to pay fines due to poverty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 275/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sagbara First Class Magistrate Court convicted the accused, Bhaveshkumar Raghubbhai Tadvi, under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B) for drug-related offense. The court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine and 2 days simple imprisonment, considering it as the accused's first offense, his status as a laborer, his remorse, and applicable Supreme Court principles against imprisoning individuals unable to pay fines due to poverty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case