THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SUBHASHBHAI BHIMSINGBHAI VASAVA Advocate - J R JAVRE — 272/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR030003132026
e-Filing Number
07-01-2026
Filing Number
272/2026
Filing Date
11-Feb-2026
Registration No
272/2026
Registration Date
11-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 03-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823021251246
Police Station
SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUBHASHBHAI BHIMSINGBHAI VASAVA Advocate - J R JAVRE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Sagbara Judicial Magistrate convicted defendant Subhashbhai Bhimsingh Gabhaith under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code, 2023 (negligent act likely to endanger human life). The court imposed a lenient sentence of a ₹200 fine and 2 days simple imprisonment, considering the accused's voluntary confession, first-time offense, financial hardship, and laborer status, in accordance with precedents from Gujarat High Court and Supreme Court favoring leniency in such circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 272/2026
Summary The Sagbara Judicial Magistrate convicted defendant Subhashbhai Bhimsingh Gabhaith under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code, 2023 (negligent act likely to endanger human life). The court imposed a lenient sentence of a ₹200 fine and 2 days simple imprisonment, considering the accused's voluntary confession, first-time offense, financial hardship, and laborer status, in accordance with precedents from Gujarat High Court and Supreme Court favoring leniency in such circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts